An nameless reader quotes a report from The New York Instances: The encryption debate between Apple and the F.B.I. might need discovered its new take a look at case. The F.B.I. mentioned on Tuesday that it had requested Apple for the information on two iPhones that belonged to the gunman within the taking pictures final month at a naval base in Pensacola, Fla., presumably establishing one other showdown over legislation enforcement’s entry to smartphones. Dana Boente, the F.B.I.’s common counsel, mentioned in a letter to Apple that federal investigators couldn’t acquire entry to the iPhones as a result of they have been locked and encrypted and their proprietor, Second Lt. Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani of the Saudi Royal Air Power, is lifeless. The F.B.I. has a search warrant for the gadgets and is in search of Apple’s help executing it, the folks mentioned.
Apple mentioned in a press release that it had given the F.B.I. all the information “in our possession” associated to the Pensacola case when it was requested a month in the past. “We are going to proceed to help them with the information we have now accessible,” the corporate mentioned. Apple frequently complies with courtroom orders to show over info it has on its servers, reminiscent of iCloud information, however it has lengthy argued that it doesn’t have entry to materials saved solely on a locked, encrypted iPhone. Earlier than sending the letter, the F.B.I. checked with different authorities companies and its nationwide safety allies to see if that they had a method into the gadgets — however they didn’t, in keeping with one of many folks accustomed to the investigation. “The official mentioned the F.B.I. was not asking Apple to create a so-called backdoor or technological resolution to get previous its encryption that should be shared with the federal government,” the report provides. “As a substitute, the federal government is in search of the information that’s on the 2 telephones, the official mentioned.”
“Apple has argued previously that getting such information would require it to construct a backdoor, which it mentioned would set a harmful precedent for person privateness and cybersecurity.” Apple didn’t touch upon the request.
Learn extra of this story at Slashdot.